Water Evaporation Rate | Physics Van (2022)

Ask a Question

Most recent answer: 10/22/2007


Can you calculate the rate at which water will flash to steam given the temperature and psia? For example, assuming approximately .8 PSIA and 100 degrees F, at what rate would the water evaporate? Would lowering the pressure or increasing the temperature change the evaporation rate significantly?Thanks.
- Rick Gresham (age 51)
Portland, OR, USA


The answer is yes, the rate that water evaporates can indeed be calculated, but it depends on a few more things than you mention. The evaporation rate is influenced by

1) The temperature of the water at the air-water surface

2) The humidity of the air

3) The area of the air-water surface

4) The temperature of the air (more on this below)

In a real-world situation of evaporating water, none of these four quantities above remains constant because the process of evaporation itself changes them. Water evaporating takes quite a lot of heat away -- 540 calories per gram -- when it evaporates. That’s enough to cool down 540 grams of water by a degree, or 50 grams of water a little more than ten degrees. If you are not very careful to replace the lost heat energy during the evaporation, the temperature will go down. And even then the temperature right at the surface will be lower than elsewhere in the water and it will depend on

5) water currents convecting heat and the ability to keep the temperature constant at 100 degrees F.

For a similar reason, the air near the surface of the water will become more saturated with water as the water evaporates. The evaporation rate will depend on:

6) airflow past the water/air surface.

These factors explain why:

People sweat to stay cool.

People say "It’s not the heat, it’s the humidity."

(Video) EVAPORATE your Grey Tank Water and NEVER go to the DUMP STATION AGAIN!

People use fans to keep themselves cool on hot days.

Spraying a fine mist of water in the air will make it evaporate faster (increased total surface area).

I am guessing your 0.8 PSIA is an indication of the partial pressure of water in the air, and that covers the humidity dependence mentioned above. Looking in a table of vapor-pressures (this tells me what the pressure of water vapor liquid water is in equilibrium with at different temperatures), I see that the vapor pressure of water at 100 degrees F is 0.96 pounds/square inch. If the vapor pressure is less than 0.8, the water would not evaporate at all, and in fact in that atmosphere, water would condense.

Irving Langmuir developed a way to measure vapor pressure
by measuring the evaporation rate, which we will now flip around backwards. His reasoning is that the rate at which molecues are lost due to evaporation to a gas with no partial pressure of the evaporating substance is the same as the rate at which molecules of the substance would hit the surface if it were in equilibrium with the vapor (because in equilibrium the evaporation rate and re-condensation rate cancel each other out). His expression is:

(mass loss rate)/(unit area) = (vapor pressure - ambient partial pressure)*sqrt( (molecular weight)/(2*pi*R*T) )

(from Zemansky and Dittman, Heat and Thermodynamics, McGraw Hill, copyright dates from 1937 to 1981 in my copy).

The ambient partial pressure of water is the 0.8 PSI you gave me, and the vapor pressure is the 0.96 PSI (we’re going to have to convert this to different units to make it work out). T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin -- 310 degrees above absolute zero. R is the gas constant which is 8.314 Joules/(mol degree K). Naturally the units of measurement in formulas like these are a disaster. I would suggest using standard Metric (SI) units for everything. Multiply the pressures in PSI by 6895 to get pressurs in Pascals (Newtons/sq. M), and the molecular weight should be in kg/mol (to cancel out the moles in the gas constant R). For water this is 0.018 kg/mole.

Doing the arithmetic gives a rather largeish number -- 1.1 kg per square meter per second. Keep in mind that this assumes that the temperature is maintained at 100 degrees at the interface and the the humidity is maintained right up to the interface, meaning that you have to blow air with a big fan at a high rate to carry away the evaporating water, and even this might not be enough (or you are in a near vacuum with only a tiny pressure of water vapor over the water), and also that there are no impurities on the water (a layer of oil will spoil the whole thing, and sweat contains lots of oils).

A real situation involves the fact that the humidity near the interface is much higher than even a short distance away, and that the water vapor must diffuse away. This effect will slow the evaporation down quite a a lot because the evaporation rate is proportional to the difference between the vapor pressure and the partial pressure of the substance, and diffusion can only take water away so fast. As the water evaporates, the partial pressure of water in the gas right over the water will be nearly equal to the vapor pressure, and then it will drop as you go away from the surface, and how steeply this drops (which depends on the airflow rate and how long the water has been there evaporating) determines the rate at which water will diffuse away. Even with a fan blowing air past the surface, the process is limited by diffusion very close to the surface because a thin layer of air (called the "boundary layer") right next to the surface does not move relative to the surface. I won’t do the work on the diffusion because it depends too much on the details of the setup. The diffusion constant for Nitrogen is 0.185 cm**2/sec at room temperature and 1 atm.

Lowering the partial pressure of water will raise the evaporation rate as mentioned above. Lowering the air pressure will increase the diffusion rate. The partial pressure of water at 100 degrees F is so high in fact, that bubbles will form spontaneously in the fluid and cause it to boil rapidly if the water is placed in a vacuum (upsetting the surface area because of all of the bubbles). Increasing the temperature will increase the evaporation rate. It appears in the denominator (in the square root) above, but a much more important dependence comes in with the vapor pressure.

vapor pressure is proportional to exp(-latent heat/RT)

(F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, McGraw Hill, 1965). The latent heat is the 540 cal/gram (watch the units again!). T again is in the absolute scale. Furthermore, as the temperature increases the diffusion rate increases too, but this is the temperature of the air, not the water -- hence the dependence on the air temperature I mentioned earlier.


(published on 10/22/2007)

Follow-Up #1: water condensation rate


related question - what about condensation rate? Let"s say that instead of 0.8 PSIA we had 1.1 PSIA. The same calculation applies but with the direction reversed?
- John (age 21)
New York, NY, USA


Yes, you're right. Unfortunately the complications still apply too. As water condenses, that leaves a depleted layer behind with less water vapor. How big an effect that is depends on how rapidly the atmosphere is stirred by winds, etc. Likewise as the vapor condenses it deposits energy in the top of the liquid, heating it up. How hot it gets (and hence how much evaporation results) depends on how well-stirred the liquid is.

Mike W.

(published on 01/16/2008)

Follow-Up #2: liquid-vapor equilibrium


Another related question - evaporation rate in a closed container:Evaporation in a closed container will proceed only until there are as many molecules returning to the liquid as there are escaping (=saturated vapor pressure). Is there a appropriate equation to calculate the conditions for such a equilibrium state? For example, I want to find out wheter a small amount of a fluid in a relatively large container at a constant temperature of the fluid can be prevented from net evaporation by increasing the pressure of the ambient air/gas in the container or by reducing the size of the container or increasing the amount of the fluid, respectively.
- Marco W. (age 35)
Z? Switzerland


Yes indeed there's an equation. It's called the Clapeyron equation, and for most conditions a simpler approximate version called the Clausius-Clapeyron equation works fine. The vapor pressure that's in equilibrium with the liquid depends strongly on the temperature, and the parameters in the equation are different for every substance.
Here's a link to a discussion of the equations: ,
These equations can also be found in any standard thermodynamics text.
The pressure obtained in the equation is the partial pressure due to the vapor from the liquid. Increasing the pressure of ambient air generally has very little effect, unless the liquid is made of the same molecules as the air, nitrogen or oxygen. So what one does is calculate the partial pressure at the given temperature, convert (using the ideal gas law pV=nRT, where p is pressure, V container volume, n moles of vapor, R the gas constant, T the absolute temperature) to figure out how many moles of vapor that would be. If the answer comes out smaller than the moles of liquid put in, the remaining liquid will be in equilibrium with the vapor. If it comes out bigger, what will happen instead is that all the liquid will vaporize.

Mike W.

(published on 03/09/2008)

Follow-Up #3: ideal evaporation rate


Your answer to calculating the evaporation rate of water is of great interest to us, but you cite Zemansky and Dittman, Heat and Thermodynamics as your source. But I have that book (7th edition) and cannot find the equation or derivation. Can you tell me where to find the equation ? And can you clarify how to find the ambient partial pressure ? Is this equation valid for water below the boiling point ?Thanks.
- Paul (age 65)
Boonville, CA, USA

(Video) Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?


Paul- I'll give a partial answer, without taking the time to track down the source of the equation.

If you look at this equation, what it's saying is that the rate at which mass is leaving the liquid when there's no vapor above the liquid is equal to the equilibrium mass density of the vapor times a typical thermal speed of one of the molecules, with a numerical factor thrown in that comes from averaging over all the directions the molecules can be moving. When there is some vapor already above the liquid, the net rate is reduced by whatever fraction of the equilibrium pressure that ambient partial pressure is. If the ambient partial pressure is already equal to the equilibrium pressure, the net rate is zero- as many molecules go from vapor to liquid as go the other way.

So the equation makes sense. In equilibrium, the rate at which molecules leave the surface is the same as the rate that they enter the surface. But you can calculate that entrance rate by assuming that the molecules in the equilibrium gas are moving with random thermal speeds. There are two simple assumptions made here- that the vapor forms a classical ideal gas (usually true) and that when a molecule from the vapor hits the liquid the chance it sticks is 100%, which I guess is pretty close to true.

The equation should work fine for water below the boiling point. However, in using this equation there's one thing you have to be very careful about. If there's no wind, the ambient partial pressure near the surface builds up to nearly the equilibrium value, so the net evaporation rate drops. How far it stays below equilibrium depends on the wind, which has no fundamental equation. You're also assuming that the evaporation rate isn't so large as to cool the surface much. That depends largely on whether the liquid is well-stirred, again not described by some fundamental equation.

As for what the ambient partial pressure is far from the surface, that's just the equilibrium vapor pressure times the relative humidity (for water), by definition of relative humidity. There's no basic equation to tell you what the relative humidity should be. It depends on what's happening with the weather. You can get instruments that will measure it, or check a weather report.

Mike W.

(published on 05/04/2009)

Follow-Up #4: Swimming pool evaporation rate


Our town is considering building a new municipal swimming pool. Part of the argument (at a recent public forum on the topic) for needing a new pool is the city officials telling us that our 240,000 gal. pool is losing 70,000 gal. every day. A woman behind me asked the question, "How much is lost from evaporation?" Is it possible for a layman to calculate a correct order-of-magnitude value for our pool's evaporation? What measurements and equations would a person need?
- Jim Rasmussen (age 52)
Hampton, IA US


Hello Jim,
We get questions like this frequently. It's a toughie. The answer depends on a number of parameters: surface area, temperature, wind speed, humidity, etc. There are so many variables that there is no simple (or even complicated) formula. The best way to determine the answer is to perform a simple experiment. Get a bucketful of water from the pool, let it sit for 24 hours and then measure the drop in the level of water. You can make a pretty good estimate of your local evaporation rate by multiplying by the ratio of surface areas of the pool and bucket, times the volume of water that has evaporated from the bucket.

It does seem, however, that 70,000 gallons a day is a bit much for evaporation. I'd really look for some other mechanism, leakage, splash over, or...

Here is a web site that explains the experiment I suggested in greater detail. Good luck.


(published on 06/21/2009)

Follow-Up #5: evaporation rate expression


The equation listed on this page for the mass loss rate:(mass loss rate)/(unit area) = (vapor pressure - ambient partial pressure)*sqrt( (molecular weight)/(2*pi*R*T) ) appears to be incorrect.This equation implies that the mass loss rate is proportional to sqrt(1/T). If this is the case, then as the temperature increases the mass loss rate decreases. This is not true.
- Joe Atherton


Whoops. We posted that comment from a reader without checking. On further consideration, we didn't even check what the expression was intended to equal.

However, if you'll note, the equation also includes the saturation vapor pressure. Even if the saturation vapor density N/V weren't increasing with T (it is), the ideal gas law p=NkT/V would say that the expression would come out an increasing function of T.

In fact, if you include that (and assume the initial vapor pressure is zero) one gets about sqrt(kT/m) N/V, where N/V is the saturation molecular concentration in the vapor. (I'm not worrying here about the numerical factor). So that is essentially the typical thermal speed times the concentration of molecules. That should be the evaporation rate in units of molecules/(area*time).

p.s. In the various notes sent in, there were two forms of the equation. One, described here, gives the number lost per area*time. The other includes an extra factor of m and gives the mass loss per area*time.

Mike W.

(Video) 3 3 3 1 Gardner steady evaporation from Water Table

(published on 06/28/2010)

Follow-Up #6: source of evaporation rate equation


In regards to the source of the equation, I believe the original work can be traced back to this reference: "Evaporation and surface structure of liquids". By G. Wyllie. Published in Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 1949, 197, pp. 383-395. The equation they report in this paper is: (2pi*mkT)^(-1/2) * (saturation vapour pressure - actual pressure) where m is the molecule's mass, k is botzmann's constant, and T is the temp in Kelvin. The units work out to (1 / sq meters * seconds)
- Scott (age 29)
Tucson, az



Mike W.

(published on 07/29/2010)

Follow-Up #7: dehumidifiers and water damage


There is a debate in the water damage restoration world. Does a dehumidifier, by taking water vapor out of the air, create evaporation in structural materials that have been water damaged?Is evaporation only created by heat?I have seen equations for calculating the evaporation rate, is humidity the part of the equation that slows down that rate or does lowering the humdity actually create evaporation?
- Ben Justesen (age 32)
Moses Lake, WA, USA


That's an interesting question. Evaporation, in the sense of water molecules leaving the surface, will happen all the time. What you guys care about, however, is net evaporation, the difference between the bare rate of water molecules leaving and the rate of others coming in from the air to the surface. Drying out the air increases the net evaporation rate by reducing the rate at which molecules come in from the air.

All the evaporation requires heat, because it take energy to break a water molecule away from the stuff it's stuck to. Even at room temperature, that heat can flow in from the surroundings. The rate at which the water molecules break loose is very sensitive to temperature, so the people who say you need to heat things up have a very good point. If you want the drying to occur fast enough to avoid much mold growth, etc., then heating things up is a big help. Running dehumidifiers also helps, as I mentioned, but even if the air is perfectly dry, that can't get the net rate any higher than the bare evaporation rate, which is highly temperature sensitive.

Mike W.

(published on 10/17/2011)

Follow-Up #8: sunlight and evaporation


I'm an engineer (did research in Urbana). I also studied Meteorology. But I wanted to get some additional insight into some “claims” over water evaporating from a man-made canal essentially due to the effects of direct sunlight. (From what I understand, water evaporation is subject to air temp vs water temp, air humidity, air flow rate as well as the surface area of the water and the turbulent flow rate of the water.) So, there has been significant politically motivated drama surrounding a Canal Top Solar Field in India (the land of hot and dry air) where, loosely covering a man-made water canal (maybe 10 meters wide) can save about 9 million liters of water (2.5 mil gals) per year. This is claimed to be … only by covering less than 1 km of a 458 km long canal. (If you perform a web search, you will see that the solar panel field is raised above the surface where air can generously flow around the water.) My question is whether the claim of loosely covering a small section of flowing water (1.7 m/s) can save up to 2.5 million gallons of water per year or whether this is huge political drama? (I guess the bigger question is asking if sunlight directly heats up water or only water particulate and flow bed surfaces?) Please let me know your thoughts.
- Sunny (age 30)
Sacramento, CA


This estimate actually looks very realistic to me, based on a crude calculation. Although all the factors you mention do show up in the net water evaporation rate, the key point is that for every kg of water that evaporates there must be a net heat flow of about 2MJ into the water to supply the latent heat. The sunlight (say 1000 W/m2) hitting that 104m2will supply a lot of energy. Some, mostly infrared, will be directly absorbed by the water. A lot of the visible light will be absorbed by those rocks at the canal bottom, and most of that heat should then be transferred to the flowing water, although some will diffuse out into the ground underneath. Within the rather large error bars of my ignorance of the details of the sunlight pattern in the area, the color of the rocks, etc., that 2.5 M gal/year sounds just about right.

This is purely a matter of keeping that extra energy from getting into the water, and makes no assumption that the flow of air over the water is reduced at all.

Mike W.

(published on 09/22/2013)

Follow-Up #9: science fair question on water evaporation rate


(Video) 90 ft. Vertical Spike Wave in Slow Mo

I am doing my research for the science fair, and my question was does water evaporate the fastest in dirt, sand, or by itself. Can you think of a way that I can guess an accurate answer without doing the experiment?
- jaden (age 11)
Irvine, CA, USA


No, I can't think of a good way to guess. Here's a few of the complications that make it hard. A plain water surface allows the wind to blow on it directly. That might help speed up evaporation. Sand has lots of little crevices that might partly fill up, increasing the surface area. That might speed evaporation. Dirt might have a rough wet surface, also increasing surface area and increasing the evaporation rate. But maybe the dirt is mostly some clay with a smooth surface, and that might reduce evaporation.

Experiments are great things!

Mike W.

posted without checking by Lee until he returns from Paris

(published on 10/14/2013)

Follow-up on this answer

Related Questions

  • expanding piston with water

  • hot fumes rise

  • water and fires

  • gin clears up a foggy glass

  • water condensing under hot tea cup

  • too weird to believe

  • evaporation

  • tea and sugar in boiling milk

  • compressing gas

  • boiling point of solutions

Still Curious?

Expore Q&As in related categories

(Video) Evaporation


The answer is yes, the rate that water evaporates can indeed be calculated, but it depends on a few more things than you mention.. The evaporation rate will depend on:. For water this is 0.018 kg/mole.. As the water evaporates, the partial pressure of water in the gas right over the water will be nearly equal to the vapor pressure, and then it will drop as you go away from the surface, and how steeply this drops (which depends on the airflow rate and how long the water has been there evaporating) determines the rate at which water will diffuse away.. The vapor pressure that's in equilibrium with the liquid depends strongly on the temperature, and the parameters in the equation are different for every substance.Here's a link to a discussion of the equations: , These equations can also be found in any standard thermodynamics text.The pressure obtained in the equation is the partial pressure due to the vapor from the liquid.

This report details the scientific method used to investigate the effects of water temperature on the rate at which the water will evaporate. Project design plan: Problem statement – The purpose

Water evaporates faster at higher temperatures although any amount of heat resulting from the release of this energy will cause water to evaporate.. http://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2002/Projects/J0615.pdf – this site provides the results of an experiment that measured which factor had the greatest effect on the rate of evaporation of water.. The results of this experiment validated the hypothesis for this experiment.. For the testing, the room temperature was stabilized at 70°.. of tap water from the gallon jug stabilized to testing room temperature into each of 3 identical 8 ounce glass glasses using a graduated measuring cup.. Using identical starting water amounts and a graduated measuring cup to measure the resulting water amounts was expected to provide the most accurate results.. Independent variables – the value being manipulated or changed in this experiment was the water temperature of the water contained in the 3 glass glasses.. Controlled variables – the controlled variables were the air humidity, the air speed, the room temperature, the type of water (tap), the amount of water, the location where the water was placed, the size of the containers used, the number of tests conducted, the type of the containers used, and the length of time the water had to evaporate.. For the testing, the room temperature was stabilized at 70°.. The hypothesis was that the temperature of the water would affect the evaporation rate of the water the most and that the higher the water temperature, the more evaporation that would occur.. The results of the 3 separate tests showed consistency in the rate of evaporation across the both the heated and room temperature sources.. controlling the air humidity, the air speed, the room temperature, the type of water (tap), the amount of water, the location where the water was placed, the size of the containers used, the number of tests conducted, the type of the containers used, and the length of time the water had to evaporate variables, enabled a controlled environment and allowed the focus of the experiment to be on the variable being manipulated which was the resulting water amount in each glass after evaporation has occurred.. Re-execution of the experiment described above and resulting similar results validates the experiment.

I walk you through how much water evaporates from your pool over time and what you should do about it.

Many factors cause evaporation, and I’ll cover them shortly.. I’ll cover more environmental factors that determine how quickly pool water evaporates shortly.. Climate is the biggest factor that determines how quickly you lose pool water to evaporation.. On the other hand, if your pool sits in a hot, sunny climate all day but you keep it covered when it’s not in use, then you’ll significantly reduce the water evaporation rate.. Long story short, even if you live in a hot climate with high evaporation rates, you can keep your pool evaporation levels closer to the two millimeters per week mark by using a solar pool cover and being mindful of how you use water features.. That’ll give you your evaporation rate per day.. Using the bucket method I described above is a great way to help you determine a leak, provided that you couple it with marking the side of your pool; if the bucket loses less water than your pool, then a leak is likely the culprit.. Any solid pool cover will significantly reduce evaporation since it lowers the surface area where water particles can escape.

In the last section, I asserted something that may have been surprising: evaporation and condensation are occurring around you simultaneously all the time, but you often don't see the results because they're happening on the molecular level. Obvious phase changes occur when there's either "net" condensation or "net" evaporation (assuming you have some liquid water to begin with). "Net" condensation means that the condensation rate exceeds the evaporation rate causing liquid water droplets to form. On the other hand, assuming you have some liquid water present to begin with, "net" evaporation, which means that the evaporation rate exceeds the condensation rate, causes liquid water droplets to shrink (or disappear altogether), or puddles on the ground to dry up, etc.

What about the condensation rate?. As the number of water vapor molecules increases, the chance of a water vapor molecule contacting the interface between air and water and condensing back into liquid also increases, which translates to an increase in the condensation rate.. So, as the number of water vapor molecules increases in the air above the water, the condensation rate increases, too.. Moreover, the temperature of the remaining water equals the temperature of the "air" above the water.. The increase in water temperature causes the evaporation rate to increase and, for a time, net evaporation occurs.. What does relative humidity tell us?. But, because relative humidity depends on the evaporation rate, which depends on temperature, relative humidity doesn't tell us how much water vapor is present in the air.. For example, the relative humidity is 100 percent in both stages of our experiment above in which the condensation rate equals the evaporation rate (equilibrium), but more water vapor molecules are present in the state of equilibrium after we've increased the temperature.. Lesson learned: When the evaporation rate is much larger than the condensation rate, there's a large difference between temperature and dew point, and relative humidity is low.

If left unchecked, evaporation affects a pool's chemical balance and the integrity of the pumping and filtration systems. Here are several ways that you can estimate your pool's evaporation rate.

Depending on where you live, an average-sized residential pool with a surface area of 400 square feet could lose as much as 10,000 gallons of water each year due to evaporation!. Given this proposition, it is a worthy investment of time to estimate just how much water your pool could lose to evaporation each year.. If you don't have a pool to measure the evaporation rate, you can simply apply the same method stated above to any container that can hold water for an extended period of time.. If you can locate an evaporation rate map for your area, you can easily calculate the amount of water that would be anticipated to evaporate from your pool.. The EPA Evaporation equation was developed to estimate evaporation from the surface of a pool of liquid that is at or near ambient temperature.. E = Evaporation Rate (gallons/day) A = Pool Surface Area (ft 2 ) W = Wind Speed Above Pool (mph) P = Water's Vapor Pressure (mmHG) at Ambient Temperature T = Temperature (°F). E = Evaporation Rate (gallons/day) A = Pool Surface Area (ft 2 ) W = Wind Speed Above Pool (mph) P = Water's Vapor Pressure (mmHG) at Ambient Temperature T = Temperature (°F). E = Evaporation Rate (gallons/day) A = Pool Surface Area (ft 2 ) F = Activity Factor (See Table at Right) P = Water's Vapor Pressure (mmHG) at Ambient Temperature P a = Water's Vapor Pressure (mmHG) at Dew Point Temperature. I'm calculating the evaporation rate for a large pool in the Bay Area, California and the pool would be heated 18hr per month.. great article for all of us pool owners its not a leak its evaporation.to check for leak use a 5 gallon bucket place it on one of your steps fill with water up to the water level of your pool mark that whith a little line if the pool and the water in the bucket drop identically you don't have leak if pool drops quicker than bucket call for service.thanks.. Using the calculation, what will be the evaporation loss of 140,000 acre feet of water (California) (based on the online calculator it translates to roughly 45 billion gallons of water}.. So then, with the announcement today on LinkedIn by ASU of the "Rio Remagined" Salt River project of 45 miles of water in the river basin, how much water will have to be used each day to keep that filled after the effects of evaporation?

A.J. Erickson, J.S. Gulliver, R.M. Hozalski, O. Mohseni, J.L. Nieber, B.N. Wilson, P.T. Weiss 

The combined effects of water surface evaporation, soil moisture evaporation, and plant transpiration for this system are often significant components of annual water budgets.. Often the complexity of plant canopies is simplified by considering only potential evapotranspiration.. High speed sensors are placed over the plant canopy or water body.. For plant canopies, an additional energy term for the movement of heat into the soil is sometimes included in equation 4.12.. From measured Bowen ratio and net radiation, ET is defined directly as given in equation 4.13.. Adjustments in the reference plant ET to actual ET are necessary.. Evaporation rates from the pan are measured and used to estimate evaporation or reference plant ET.. Pan evaporation rates are typically greater than actual lake evaporation and reference plant ET rates.. Most pollutants (e.g., phosphorus, chloride, solids)do not evaporate and will become more concentrated as water evaporates from an open surface or from the soil.. It is recommended that indirect methods of estimation be used in most cases, but direct methods should be used when more accurate measurements of evaporation or ET are necessary.

Wondering how much water evaporates from a pool? Learn how much water loss is normal, when it’s a concern, and when to call in the professionals.

Evaporation that’s greater in hot weather, especially when there’s a lack of rainfall A pool leak, especially if you’re losing more than two inches of pool water weekly. The question of how much water evaporates from a pool is an important one to ask, so that you can address a pool leak sooner rather than later.. Even taking that into account, with the hot and humid weather conditions here in Florida, you’ll typically see a higher pool evaporation rate than most other states.. Oval pools: Their formula is L x W x D x 5.9, which means that a 15’ by 30’ pool that’s, on average, 5’ deep, there would be 13,275 gallons of water (15 x 30 x 5 x 5.9).. It’s important to regularly top off the pool to the appropriate level, something you can do yourself or have a pool company handle.. No matter how you top off your pool, you’ll need to regularly test and balance the water.. This situation may well indicate a leak.. SparklingJOMO Plus : With this plan, you’ll receive comprehensive cleaning services, plus equipment checks, and water balancing 50 times a year.

This study compared water temperature and water loss by evaporation in control ponds and in ponds aerated with surface aerators at four different aeration rates. Increased aeration rate increases the evaporation rate, which in turn lowers water temperature.

There is no available information on the effect of mechanical aeration with surface aerators on evaporation rate or water temperature in aquaculture ponds.. This article is adapted and summarized from the original publication ( Aquaculture Research 49(6):2184–2192 ), which compared water temperature and water loss by evaporation in control ponds and in ponds aerated with surface aerators at four different aeration rates.. Surface water temperature, water temperature at 70-cm depth in each pond, and air temperature were monitored at 1-hour intervals using commercial, HOBO Pendant ® Temperature Data Loggers (HOBOware ® ; Janesville, Wisc., USA).. D = average depth of pond (mm); T1 = average water temperature of NEC pond; T2 = average water temperature of aerated pond; 540 = latent heat of vaporization of water is 540 calories/gram.. Both control ponds – NEC and C – had greater water temperature – at the surface and 70-cm depth – than all aerated ponds.. TemperatureAeration rate (hp/acre): 0 (C)Aeration rate (hp/acre): 0 (NEC)Aeration rate (hp/acre): 5Aeration rate (hp/acre): 10Aeration rate (hp/acre): 15Aeration rate (hp/acre): 20Surface29.48a ± 0.0629.02b ± 0.0628.04c ± 0.0627.16d ± 0.0626.93d ± 0.0626.08e ± 0.0670-cm depth29.46a ± 0.0729.43a ± 0.0728.1b ± 0.0627.09c ± 0.0626.8d ± 0.0625.89e ± 0.06Table 1.. Means ± standard errors (SE) for water temperature – at the surface and 70-cm depth – in each pond over a 24-hour period (indicated by the same letter in a row do not differ at p < 0.05).Over 24-hour periods, the average surface water temperature in aerated ponds was decreased by 0.92 to 2.84 degrees-C for an aeration rate of 5 and 20 hp/acre, respectively.. While the average water temperature at 70-cm depth in aerated ponds was decreased by 1.26 to 3.42 degrees-C for an aeration rate of 5 and 20 hp/acre, respectively.. 2) to reveal the strong linear relationship between aeration rate (hp/acre) and the mean decrease in water temperature in aerated ponds related to that in the NEC.. 2: Relationships between the aeration rate (hp/acre), and the differences in water temperature – at the surface and 70-cm depth – between aerated ponds and the nutrient-enriched control pond when aerators were operated continuously for 24 hours.Shallow aquaculture ponds stratify thermally during daytime and destratify during nighttime.. In wastewater treatment ponds, different types of aeration systems cause different rates of heat loss; therefore, further work is required to study the heat loss caused by different aerator types in aquaculture ponds.. Evaporation rate increased 32 and 92 percent when ponds were aerated for 24 hours with one and four Air-O-Lator aerators, respectively.. Increased aeration rate increases the evaporation rate, which in turn, lowers water temperature.. The most reliable means of controlling aerator operation to periods of undesirable low dissolved oxygen concentration is to use an automated system that turns aerators on and off in response to concentration monitored by an oxygen sensor that communicates with the aerator.. There are many kinds of aerators and commercial ponds are usually aerated with larger units than used in this research; therefore, further work is required to study the heat loss and water loss caused by different aerator types.

Evaporation is the process by which water gets converted from liquid to vapor. Evaporation occur below the boiling point of liquid.

Vapour pressures Wind speed Atmospheric pressure Air and water temperatures Size of the water body Concentration of substance. Evaporation can be measured by 3 methods.. Evaporation is measured by measuring the depth of water in a stilling well with a hook gauge.. A fixed point gauge indicates the level of water water is added to or removed from the pan to maintain the water level at a fixed mark using a calibrated cylindrical measure. Supported by drum floats in the middle of a raft size 4.25 * 4.87 m, it is set afloat in a lake with a view to simulate the characteristic of a large body of water. Lake Evaporation = Pan Coefficient ( Cp ) * Pan Evaporation. Sr NoTypes Of PanAvg ValueRange1Class A Land Pan0.700.60-0.802ISI Pan0.800.65-1.103Colorado Sunken Pan0.780.75-0.864USGS Floating Pan0.800.70-0.82Evaporation Pans are normally located at stations where other hydro metrological data are collected.. (I ) Water Budget Method. If the unit of time is kept very large, estimates of evaporation will be more accurate.

To determine how much water your pond will hold when it is full you need to calculate:

You have thus calculated the surface area of the pond and the. average water depth of the pond.. Now, using the figures you have. found, you can calculate the volume of water in the pond by multiplying. the surface in square metres (m 2 ) by the average water. depth in metres (m) to get the volume of the pond in cubic metres. (m 3 ).. Water that is lost vertically through the bottom. of the pond, horizontally through the dikes by infiltration, and. through the drainage system of the pond is called seepage. water.. After the pond has been filled with water for some time, the. water tends to break down the soil structure and the soil pores. become sealed by organic matter that collects on the pond bottom.. You are going to puddle a pond with a surface area of 1. 500 m 2 ; the soil of the pond bottom is loam; you want. to find the amount of water needed to compensate for seepage losses. during 6 months after puddling.. To calculate evaporation losses, multiply the water surface area. (in m 2 ) by the corrected evaporation rate (in m) for. the length of time your pond will be in use.. Add the rates (in mm) for each month and multiply this sum. by 0.75 (correction factor for Class A Pan rates) to find the. total corrected evaporation (in mm) for all the months; Divide this total corrected evaporation (in mm) by 1 000 to. express the evaporation in metres; Multiply this value (in m) by the water surface area (in m 2 ). to find the total water losses by evaporation (in m 3 ). for the months your pond will be in use.. The amount of water needed to fill the pond in a reasonable. length of time; The amount of water needed to compensate for seepage and evaporation. losses over the planned fish-growing period.. Before you begin to build a pond it will be helpful to compare. the number of days needed to fill ponds of various sizes and the. rate of water flow required.. To calculate the number of days. to fill a pond, divide the planned pond water volume by this daily. water flow.. Using Table 1 you find that with 14 l/s you can fill one pond. of 2500 m 3 in 2 days; Or, with 14 l/s, you can fill one pond of 5000 m 3 in 4 days; Using the values in Table 1 you can also calculate that with. 14 l/s you can fill one pond of 10 000 m 3 in 8 days.. With 14 l/s you can build one pond of 2 500 m 3 this. year and fill it in 2 days and expand your operation next year. to two ponds of 2 500 m 3 that can both be filled in. 4 days with the water flow available.. In addition to the water needed initially to fill a pond, you will. need to add water regularly, over the length of the growing season,. to compensate for seepage and evaporation losses.. Before you begin to build a pond you should estimate how much water. you will need to compensate for seepage and evaporation. losses , per hectare of pond area, so that your available water. supply will be sufficient during the driest season.. Note: when adding water to a pond to compensate. for seepage and evaporation losses, add only enough water to keep. the water level at the normal height.

Water evaporation is a process by which water molecules under high conditions of temperature change phase from liquid to gaseous form. Here are some great examples of water evaporation.

Water evaporation occurs because, at high temperature, water molecules vibrate rapidly, which results in some of the molecules gaining enough energy to escape from the lattice network of water molecules.. Water evaporation occurs in the earth’s water cycle when energy from the sun causes water to heat up and evaporate from the earth’s surface.. The fast-moving molecules escape, while the remaining molecules which possess lower average kinetic energy remain and the temperature of the liquid decreases with an increased rate of evaporation.. There are some liquids that do not evaporate visibly at a given temperature in a given gas (e.g., cooking oil at room temperature) have molecules that do not tend to transfer energy to from one to another in a pattern sufficient to frequently give a molecule the heat energy necessary to turn into vapor.. Significant proportions of water molecules return to the liquid state, as the rate of returning molecules becoming more frequent due to an increase in the density and pressure of the vapor increases.. When the process of escape and return reaches equilibrium, the vapor is said to be saturated and no further change in either vapor pressure or density or liquid temperature will occur.. 6) Water bodies such as lakes and rivers lose all or part of their content to the atmosphere through water evaporation.. The molecules which have attained sufficient energy thereby undergo a change of phase from liquid to the gaseous state and exhibit kinetic energy at escape.


1. Evaporative cooling | Water, acids, and bases | Biology | Khan Academy
(Khan Academy)
2. DIY Salt-Water Survival Bottle (Compact Desalination Kit)
3. How to Boil Water with a Magnets
4. Heat of vaporization of water and ethanol | Biology | Khan Academy
(Khan Academy)
5. How Car Cooling System Works
(Automotive System)
6. Radiation, convection, evaporation and conduction for the human body

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Kimberely Baumbach CPA

Last Updated: 08/04/2022

Views: 5827

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kimberely Baumbach CPA

Birthday: 1996-01-14

Address: 8381 Boyce Course, Imeldachester, ND 74681

Phone: +3571286597580

Job: Product Banking Analyst

Hobby: Cosplaying, Inline skating, Amateur radio, Baton twirling, Mountaineering, Flying, Archery

Introduction: My name is Kimberely Baumbach CPA, I am a gorgeous, bright, charming, encouraging, zealous, lively, good person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.